Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Future Healthc J ; 9(3): 291-294, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2203508

ABSTRACT

Background: Shielding during the COVID-19 pandemic impacted postgraduate medical training, likely affecting between 7% and 14% of trainees. We examine the burden of shielding on this cohort and provide strategies for future working practices. Methods: Seventeen postgraduate doctors in training took part in non-incentivised, virtual focus groups or interviews. Focus group content underwent thematic analysis. Results were validated in subsequent focused interviews. Results: Shielding trainees reported guilt, limited support and occasionally stigmatisation. Rotational changes and returning to work were also difficult and led to contractual challenges. Departmental support, IT provision and proactivity were key to successful shielding. Early discussion with training bodies was deemed essential to plan objective onward progression. Conclusion: As we enter an era of endemic COVID-19, adjusted working practices will continue. Embedding successful working practices for shielding at national and local levels will minimise the long-term impact on postgraduate medical training.

2.
J Educ Eval Health Prof ; 18: 5, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1243937

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Self-directed learning (SDL) has been increasingly emphasized within medical education. However, little is known about the SDL resources medical students use. This study aimed to identify patterns in medical students' SDL behaviors, their SDL resource choices, factors motivating these choices, and the potential impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on these variables. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey comprising multiple-choice, ranked, and free-text response questions were disseminated to medical students across all 41 UK medical schools between April and July 2020. Independent study hours and sources of study materials prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic were compared. Motivational factors guiding resource choices and awareness of Free Open Access Meducation were also investigated. Results: The target sample was 75 students per medical school across a total of 41 medical schools within the United Kingdom (3,075 total students), and 1,564 responses were analyzed. University-provided information comprised the most commonly used component of independent study time, but a minority of total independent study time. Independent study time increased as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic (P<0.001). All sub-cohorts except males reported a significant increase in the use of resources such as free websites and question banks (P<0.05) and paid websites (P<0.05) as a result of the pandemic. Accessibility was the most influential factor guiding resource choice (Friedman's µrank=3.97, P<0.001). Conclusion: The use of learning resources independent of university provision is increasing. Educators must ensure equitable access to such materials while supporting students in making informed choices regarding their independent study behaviors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Pandemics , Self-Directed Learning as Topic , Students, Medical , Access to Information , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL